Secure Your On-Premise TM1 Documentation: 5 Hidden Risks to Fix Now

Unsecured TM1 documentation is now a $2M+ risk. Learn 5 best practices to secure your IBM Planning Analytics environment in 2025 without sacrificing efficiency.

The Hidden Security Crisis in Your TM1 Environment

Real Security Incident: In 2022, financial services firm, Block (formerly Square), suffered a significant data breach. The breach didn’t come from outside attackers. It came from unsecured internal documentation, where an unauthorized employee downloaded reports containing sensitive customer financial data.  
 
This isn't an isolated incident. In 2023, financial services organizations suffered an average data breach cost of $5.9 million, 27% above the global average across all industries (Trustwave, 2023, Statista, 2024). What is worse, is that: 35% of breaches involved shadow data (unsecured, undocumented files) (IBM, 2024). 

If you’re using IBM Planning Analytics (TM1), your documentation isn’t just internal notes. It’s your financial DNA: Forecasting logic, consolidation structure, allocation rules, and cross-system mappings. 

The risk? Security-conscious enterprises often face an impossible choice: Block documentation (causing operational risk) or allow potentially unsecured documentation (creating security vulnerabilities).
But you don’t have to make that choice.

Secure TM1 Documentation Starts Here
 

If you suspect that you may be at risk of a security data breach, do not fret. 
This guide will equip you with clear, actionable strategies to implement secure, compliant TM1 documentation: 

✔ 5 Common TM1 Documentation Risks (and how to fix them) 
✔ On-Premise vs. Cloud Documentation: Which is Superior 
✔ 5 Security Best Practices (Updated for 2025) 
✔ Security vs. Efficiency: How You Can Have Both 

By implementing these practices, you’ll turn TM1 documentation from a security risk into a security asset, while reducing manual workload. 

The Evolving Security Landscape for IBM Planning Analytics 


3 Factors that Make 2025 a Security Inflection Point 

  1. Expanding Regulatory Requirements 

Beyond established frameworks like SOX, GDPR, and CCPA, global regulators now demand proven documentation standards for financial systems: 

  • EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA):  
    Mandates comprehensive documentation of critical financial systems, including planning tools (Octopus, 2025). 
  • SEC's cybersecurity disclosure rules:  
    Require documentation of access controls and system architecture (Zscaler, 2023).  
  • NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5:  
    Adds specific requirements for documentation of financial planning systems used in government and critical infrastructure (Hyperproof, 2025). 
  1. Expanding Attack Surface 
    Hybrid TM1 environments, cloud misconfigurations, and AI-powered threats have increased the risk of silent model manipulation (MITRE, 2025; Hoxhunt, 2025; Stack.watch, 2025). 
  2. Documentation as a Breach Vector 
    Unsecured internal documentation now accounts for 35% of breaches (IBM, 2024).  

Bottom Line: With expanding regulations, hybrid environments and increasingly prevalent AI-driven phishing attacks, secure documentation has become an imperative, not an option. 

Your TM1 documentation must be real-time, access-controlled, and fully auditable


Does your TM1 documentation feel overwhelming? The real culprit may be model complexity

💡 Take our 2-Minute TM1 Complexity Assessment to find out.
FREE and instant. 

Take our FREE complexity assessment 

Snapshot: Impact of Documentation Security Failures 

Security breaches stemming from improper TM1 documentation manifest in several specific ways: 

Risk Type 

Description 

Business Impact 

Data Exfiltration 

Exposed connection strings and configuration details allow direct access to systems 

Breaches, downtime, potential data loss 

Logic Exposure 

Leaked allocation logic and forecasting methods reveal competitive IP 

Strategic leakage, competitor advantage 

Audit Failures 

Inability to produce secure documentation for compliance 

Failed audits, Average $350K+ in remediation costs 

Shadow Documentation 

Unapproved tools used to create undocumented security risks (Eg. Personal OneNote files, unauthorized cloud services) 

Blind spots, insider risk, data leaks 

The average remediation cost across these risks exceeds $2.3 million per incident.  
And guess what? The $2.3 million does not include costs from reputational damage and regulatory penalties.


5 Common TM1 Documentation Security Risks 

1. Spreadsheet Proliferation 

This is the most common form of TM1 documentation, often containing connection strings, server names, and user roles.
 
Once shared via email or cloud folders, they escape your governance perimeter, creating permanent data exposure. 
 
In one case, a TM1 server configuration spreadsheet leaked to a competitor when an analyst changed jobs. 

Fix: Store documentation metadata securely inside TM1 using secure cubes with only READ access for relevant Administrators.

2. Screenshot Documentation
 

Screenshots often reveal sensitive data, credentials, or access settings without control or traceability.  
 
One incident exposed an admin’s session credentials and server FQDN captured in a UI screenshot. 

Fix: Replace screenshots with TM1 Web’s URL API to generate sanitized, access-controlled views. 

3. Third-Party Cloud Documentation Tools 

Using generic cloud documentation tools often means business logic leaves your security perimeter. Many operate outside procurement oversight via freemium models, creating shadow IT risks and unsanctioned data repositories your security team can’t see. 

Fix: Use an on-premises documentation tool integrated with TM1’s REST API to keep all metadata within your firewall. 

4. Consultant-Maintained Documentation
 

Relying on consultants to maintain TM1 documentation often means the only copy lives on external laptops or systems.  
 
Updates happen sporadically, only during billable hours. This leads to documentation decay and external exposure of sensitive rule logic and configurations. 

Fix: Centralize all documentation inside your secured IBM Planning Analytics Workspace (PAW) environment with role-based consultant access. 

Example PAW Book Structure for Secure Documentation 
- Financial Models Documentation 
  |- Model Overview (Public) 
  |- Dimension Structures (Finance Team) 
  |- Calculation Logic (Power Users) 
  |- Security Configuration (Admins Only) 

5. Lack of Access Controls for Documentation 

Even when documentation lives internally, it’s often stored in shared folders with flat permissions (everyone has the same access) and no audit trail of documentation access. 
 
This violates the principle of least privilege and enables employees lateral access to critical financial system information beyond their operational needs. 

Fix: Use TM1’s SecurityOverlay functions to control access to privileged information. 

Example: How to Grant read-only access to documentation for a limited-access user
SecurityOverlayGlobalLockCell(bLock, Cube, element1,..., elementN) 


On-Premise vs. Cloud TM1 Documentation 


Why On-Premise TM1 Documentation is Superior 

For organizations with stringent security requirements, on-premise documentation offers decisive advantages: 

1. Data Sovereignty
All documentation remains within your security perimeter, subject to your existing security controls and monitoring systems.  

This is particularly critical for organizations in financial services, healthcare, and government sectors where data locality requirements are strict. 

2. Integration with Identity Systems 
On-premise solutions can directly leverage your existing Active Directory or LDAP infrastructure. 

3. Network Controls 
Your existing firewall and network segregation policies apply without exception

4. Audit Trail Integration
On-premise documentation systems can feed directly into your existing SIEM solution 

5. Compliance Alignment
On-premise documentation inherits your existing compliance certifications without requiring separate vendor assessments.

Many organizations mistakenly believe that choosing on-premise means sacrificing functionality. Read the next section where we debunk the top 3 myths. 


TM1 Documentation Dilemma: Insecure Practices vs. Inefficient Tools 


Manual Risk vs. Secure Automation 

The fundamental challenge in TM1 documentation has been the perceived trade-off between security and efficiency. Teams often resort to insecure practices because secure alternatives seem too cumbersome.

The solution: Automation that works entirely within your security boundary

The Real Trade-Off: Manual Risk vs. Automated Control 

Line graph comparing manual vs automated TM1 documentation risk over time. Manual curve rises steeply. Automated stays flat. Illustrates value of automation.
Manual documentation gets riskier the longer it sits untouched. Automation flattens that curve.

Manual documentation = human error, outdated logic, inconsistent security policies, and unmonitored sharing.  
 
In contrast, Omni connects to TM1 APIs, applies access control, and logs everything without your data ever leaving your firewall. 

Omni Results Snapshot 

✔ 100% of documentation stays within your firewall  
✔ 90% faster audit prep and compliance checks 
✔ 5× faster detection of security risks 
✔ 70% less time spent on version control and traceability 
✔ 63% cut in manual effort securing documentation across cubes 
✔ 60% ROI via fewer breaches and audit penalties 

The choice is clear: Automate complexity analysis.   
Secure TM1 documentation fast. Reclaim 90% of your time and recover lost profit, without rewriting a line of code.